Politics & International Relations 09

TOPIC

Why nuclear weapons are not completely banned?

(上記TOPIC、英語で意見を論理的に述べる技術とトレーニング第7章より引用)

Essay

 When something is completely banned, politicians see no profit in it and believe that the existence is inconvenient to them and there is no use for it. Therefore, to put it in other words, when something is not completely banned even if it is nuclear weapons, some politicians see some profit in it and believe the existence is convenient to them and there is use for it.
 Firstly, some politicians see profit in nuclear weapons because they make a fortune out of wars. For example, banks make money from wars because a lot of money is necessary to wage wars and the government has to depend on banks for money. Therefore nuclear armaments are profitable and convenient to politicians who take bribes from banks.
 Secondly some politicians believe that they need nuclear weapons to protect the country and themselves from other countries and terrorists who have nuclear weapons and threaten to use them.
 As for solutions, the only way to eradicate nuclear weapons is to establish the world in which money does not exist and there are no wars and no fights.
 In conclusion, the reasons nuclear weapons are not completely banned is that some politicians see some profit in them and believe the existence is convenient to them and they are useful, for the aforementioned reasons.

メモ

なぜ核兵器は完全に禁止されないか?です。
Obstacles to nuclear disarmamentと似たような内容だったので、ちょっと違う切り口で書いてみましたが、解決策の内容は同じです。
これも難しいトピックで、私の知識不足、実力不足も相まって、かなり時間がかかってしまいました。